Thursday, December 4, 2008

The lotus in the swamp

The lotus in the swamp
Mohanbir S. Sawhney November 27, 2008

UNUSUAL ENTREPRENEURS

These are tough times for entrepreneurs. We are going through one of the worst economic crises in history. The meltdown in financial markets has plunged economies around the world into a recession.

Entrepreneurs are finding that investors have all but disappeared and revenues are declining as customers cut back spending. Given these woes in the capital markets and the economy, it seems that this is a very bad time to start a new company or to grow a start-up business.

Yet, history suggests that difficult economic conditions may actually be the best of times for entrepreneurship. Like a lotus that thrives in a dirty swamp, some of the most innovative companies have emerged during deep recessions.

And just as the lotus relies on the swamp for its nutrition, startup companies can actually benefit from difficult economic conditions. The Great Depression of 1929 was the most severe and prolonged economic crisis the world has ever seen.

And yet, it was during these times that great companies like Motorola and Texas Instruments were founded. Ironically, it was during the Depression that Fortune was launched, when there wasn’t much business to talk about. The next biggest recession the United States experienced was in 1982, as the economy shrank by 2.2 per cent and unemployment spiked at 10.8 per cent.

However, it was during this time that we saw the birth of the IBM PC, the founding of Sun Microsystems, and the creation of Cisco Systems. These events gave birth to the PC industry, the computer workstation industry and the networking industry.

Twenty years later, as the US was again mired in recession in 2001, Apple launched its first retail store and introduced its revolutionary iPod digital music player. As Steve Jobs noted, Apple does not pay attention to the state of the economy. Instead, it believes that as long as it keeps putting great products in front of customers, they will continue to open their wallets.

Why are difficult economic times a good time for start-ups and innovation? There are several reasons. First, when funding is easy to come by, as it was during the dotcom boom, there is a lot of noise and confusion in the marketplace.

Many dubious business concepts get funded, and it is difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. Start-ups are locked into a mad race to “get big fast”, even though they cannot absorb the pace of growth that is demanded by impatient investors.

In my experience, far more start-up companies die of indigestion than of starvation. When you get too much money too fast, you end up spending it in foolish ways. And you don’t have as much pressure to make the business profitable, because you can always raise more money.

Just as homeowners in the US got into trouble when banks lent them more money than they should have, venture investors tend to pressure start-up companies to accept more capital than they need, which can end up getting them into trouble in the long run.

Another reason that recessions are good for start-ups is that customers become more demanding about value for money. So start-up companies are forced to ask themselves hard questions about what value they offer to their customers and why customers should do business with them.

When a market is growing rapidly, it doesn’t take much to sell your products and services. After all, a rising tide lifts all fortunes. But, as the legendary investor Warren Buffet observed, it is when the tide goes out that you find out who has been swimming naked.

Finally, a recession in an industry often signals that the current technologies and current business models are running out of steam, and that it is time for disruptive new technologies and innovative business models to take hold. For instance, the Desktop computing paradigm grew out of the declining fortunes of the Mainframe computing paradigm.

Similarly, we are witnessing a slowdown in the Enterprise Software market, but at the same time, we are witnessing the emergence of Software as a Service (SaaS) paradigm and the Open Source Software paradigm, which have the potential to usher in a new era of software, applications and devices. Take the mobile device industry, for example.

While the fortunes of conventional mobile handset manufacturers like Motorola and Sony Ericsson are declining, we are seeing the creation of open-source mobile devices based on Google’s operating system, location-based services on mobile devices, mobile gaming, mobile advertising and mobile commerce.

Entrepreneurship may actually thrive in difficult economic times, because entrepreneurs need to be more disciplined
Entrepreneurship may actually thrive in difficult economic times, because entrepreneurs need to be more disciplined
Customers’ needs do not disappear in a recession. There is always room to innovate, and even more room when the existing paradigm is looking tired.

So the spirit of entrepreneurship remains alive and well even when things look gloomy. And entrepreneurship in India is no exception. Despite all the bad news we read about in the newspapers and the breathtaking decline of the Indian stock market, the Indian entrepreneurship scene is more vibrant than ever before.

A case in point— the Tata NEN Hottest Start-ups contest that is currently ongoing has received over 500 entries. The range of industries and markets these start-ups represent is amazingly diverse—from traditional domains like IT, Internet, media, outsourcing and retail to newer domains like healthcare, cleantech, biotech and agribusiness. And the fundamentals of the Indian economy remain solid.

The Indian Internet audience grew to 28 million users by April 2008, a 27 per cent increase from the previous year. The mobile subscriber industry in India continues to be on a tear, reaching 315 million subscribers by September 2008, with 10 million new subscribers being added every month.

And despite the economic slowdown, the organised retail market continues to hold immense opportunity as it still stands at only 4 per cent of the total retail market. The silver lining to the devaluation of the Indian rupee is that revenues for start-up companies focused on the US and Europe are almost 25 per cent higher in rupee terms than they were six months ago.

Clearly, there is no shortage of opportunities in the market. And there is no shortage of talented and passionate entrepreneurs who are pursuing these opportunities.

However, entrepreneurs do need to recalibrate their strategies for difficult economic times, as investment capital becomes scarce and the marketplace slows down. They need to think differently about their markets, their offerings, their approach to funding, and their operations. Here are some tips for surviving and thriving in difficult economic times:

Grow organically: Think about how you can grow your start-up company with minimal or no external capital. This might sound difficult, but on deeper reflection, investment capital is usually required for two reasons: to fund product development and to get big fast in a competitive race.

I advise entrepreneurs to begin with project-based services that can provide quick revenues and lessen the cash burn, and then gradually invest in product development as they generate resources organically. The mantra is “servicise to learn, and then productise to earn”.

Further, in difficult economic times, getting big fast may not be essential, because the race will be won not by those who run the fastest, but by those who last the longest. So you can afford to slow down and pace yourself to run a marathon, instead of burning out quickly in a frantic sprint fuelled by venture capital.

Sharpen your value proposition: As customers become more demanding, you can’t afford to be wishy-washy about why they should be doing business with your company. You need to communicate your value proposition clearly, crisply and concisely.

What benefits do you offer? When, where and who should be using your products? What situations or scenarios have you optimised your offerings for? How are your offerings better than competing alternatives, including the alternative of not buying anything at all?

How can you make it easier for customers to do business with you? How can you reduce their perceived risk of using your products or doing business with a small company? These are questions you should pay close attention to.

Diversify your markets: For a start-up company, it is a good idea not to have all your eggs in one basket. If you focus exclusively on one market, you are more vulnerable to sharp downturns in that market or in currency fluctuations.

For instance, the US market looked very lucrative a few years ago for Indian IT companies, but an over-dependence on the US is now hurting them. As an entrepreneur, think about how you can make your products and services relevant to the Indian market as well as to developed markets.

Variablise your assets: Fixed assets are the bane of start-up companies. You need loads of capital to acquire fixed assets, and they greatly limit your flexibility once you have acquired them. So, whether it is real estate, computers, software, office equipment or even staffing, think ten times before you put a single rupee into the ground.

Instead of buying servers and setting up data centres, use virtual “cloud computing” services like. Rent your office space, your office furniture and your office staff.

Use part-timers where you can to reduce your burn rate. I have seen start-up companies even time-share their executive management— hiring a part-time CFO or CMO until they have the resources and the need for highly-paid executive talent.

Variablising your assets makes you leaner and more agile, putting you in a better position to ride out the storm.

The spirit of entrepreneurship lives on in times good and bad. Entrepreneurship may thrive in difficult economic times, because entrepreneurs need to be more disciplined, more focused, and less distracted by competition.

If entrepreneurs can adapt their strategies to position themselves for the downturn, the same economic headwinds that are slowing them down can become the wind at their back, propelling them to the Promised Land.

—The author is McCormick Tribune Professor of Technology and director, Centre for Research in Technology and Innovation, Kellogg School of Management.


http://indiatoday.digitaltoday.in/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&issueid=82&id=21101&Itemid=1&sectionid=3&completeview=1

Courtesy: India Today

Thursday, October 16, 2008

வெளிச்சம் வெளியே இல்லை

வெளிச்சம் வெளியே இல்லை - மு. மேத்தா


வீட்டுக்கு வெளியே ஓர் ஓரமாய்த் தயங்கித் தயங்கி உட்கார்ந்திருக்கிறது நம்பிக்கை வெகு நேரமாய்!


கவலையும் பயமும் என்னைக் கட்டிப் பிடித்துக்கொண்டு கட்டிலில் என்னுடன்.


சாயங்காலத்துக் காற்றுப் போல் உரிமையோடு உள்ளே நுழையும் சலனம்.
விரக்தி- ஒரு போர்வையாய் என் தலை முதல் கால்வரை போர்த்தியிருக்கும்.
வீட்டுக்கு வெளியே ஓர் ஓரமாய்த் தயங்கித் தயங்கி உட்கார்ந்திருக்கிறது நம்பிக்கை வெகு நேரமாய்!


நம்பிக்கையிடம் சலனமும் பெரு மூச்சும் சண்டை பிடிக்க பயம் ஓடிச்சென்று பரிகாசம் செய்கிறது:


"ஐயன்மீர் யாரோ? ஓ... பழைய நண்பரா?
பார்வையாளர் நேரம் முடிந்துவிட்டது... பயனெதுவும் இல்லை.


போவீர்... வருவீர் போய் வருவீர்!"


வேக வேகமாய் வந்த விரக்தி விரட்டுகிறது:


"அவசியம் பார்க்க வேண்டுமென்று அடம் பிடிக்காதே.


அவரோ - நூறு வகையான நோய்களில் நொந்து போய்ப்


படுத்த படுக்கையில் படுபாடு படுகிறார்.


இன்றோ நாளையோ அவர் இறந்த பிறகு


தந்தி கொடுக்கிறோம் தாராளமாய் வா.


இப்போது உடனே இடத்தைக் காலிசெய்!"


நகரா திருக்கும் நம்பிக்கை மோதும் குரலில் முழக்கமிடுகிறது.


"உள்ளே நுழைவதைத் தடுக்கிறீர்கள்...


எனது உரத்த குரலினை என்ன செய்வீர்கள்?"


பயமும் கவலையும் பஞ்சினைத் தேடின... என் காதுகளை அடைக்கக் கனத்த முயற்சிகள்...


குறுக்கீடுகளைத் தாண்டி நம்பிக்கை குரல் கொடுக்கிறது:


"தோழனே! ஓ! என் தோழனே! நான் தான் உனது நம்பிக்கை நண்பன்.


சுதந்திரக் கொடியின் சுடரொளியாக உச்சிக் கம்பத்தில் உயரப் பறந்த நீ ஏன் இப்போது


அரைக் கம்பத்தில் இறங்கி அழத் தொடங்குகிறாய்?


அவிழ்க்க முடியாமல் உன்னை அவதிப் படுத்தும் விரக்தியின் முடிச்சுகளை வெட்டி எறி!


உன்னுடைய புண்களின் மீது புன்னகையைத் தடவு!


எதிர் காலத்தை எழுதுவதற்கு உன் மனதில் பட்ட காயங்களில் மை தொட்டுக் கொள்!


போர்வைகளில் ஏன் இப்படிப் புதைந்து கிடக்கிறாய்?


விழித்து நீ எழுந்தால் விலங்குகளே நொறுங்கும்!


சின்ன நூல்கண்டா உன்னைச் சிறைப்படுத்தி வைப்பது?"


நம்பிக்கையின் வார்த்தை மின்சாரம் நரம்புகளில் பாய்ந்து


உறக்கத்தைக் கலைத்து உசுப்பிவிட


விரக்திப் போர்வையை வீசி எறிந்தேன் -


கவலை பயங்களை ஓரத்தில் விழும்படி உதறி எழுந்தேன்


தடைகளை மீறித் தாழ்ப்பாள் திறந்து


அருமை நண்பனை உள்ளே அழைத்தேன்!


நானும் நம்பிக்கையும் கை குலுக்கிக் கொண்டு நாற்காலிகளில் அருகருகே அமர்ந்திருக்க


எடுபிடி வேலை செய்யத் துவங்கின இதுவரை என்னை ஏவிக்கொண்டிருந்த கவலையும் பயமும்.


தேநீர் கொண்டுவந்து மேசையில் வைத்து "சர்க்கரை போதுமா சார்?" என்று கேட்டன.


சலனம்- பெருமூச்சோடு காலிக் கோப்பைகளை எடுத்துச் சென்று கழுவி வைத்தது...


விரக்தி மட்டும் ஒரு கௌரவமான வில்லன் போல் விடைபெற்றுக் கொண்டு வெளியேறியது!

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Kashmir What's Your Destiny

Posted by: Vijayabharathi C

It’s August 24, 2008


It’s curfew time in Srinagar, the capital of Indian Administrated Kashmir. Most people are staying indoors and the atmosphere is one of eerie silence. A loud scream piercing the silence originates from the street running by Ghulam Qadir Hajam's house, deep inside a maze of narrow lanes. Hajam knew it was his son Mohammad Yaqoob who had just stepped out to fetch milk for preparing the afternoon tea. Anxious, the 70-year-old local barber first asks his other son Hilal to check. The screams grow louder now and he decides to go out as well. Moments later, he is shot dead in cold blood. The CRPF men opened fire at him, a few meters outside his house. His son, Yaqoob too was hit with bullets and both are battling for life. Hilal is clueless as to what crime his father and brother had committed, to get a round of bullets in the chest. As Hilal is crying on the road, an ambulance takes the people towards the nearest hospital....

It’s October 24 1947

The clock is now shifted back by 61 years. It’s a chilly autumn night on 24th October 1947..Maharaja hari singh, ruler of J & K is merrily enjoying the festival of lord Shiva in his palatial palace in the presence of his commanders and ministers. This festival is prominent for its colorfulness and vivacity. But, at the same time, 100 Miles away a man is busy lighting the fuse of a few gelatin sticks covertly placed in the main chamber of the Mohra hydro electric power station, constructed on the banks of river Jhelum. A few seconds later, a thunderous noise erupts and the entire power station is reduced to rubble. The aftershock of the blast could be felt 100 miles away from the power station, when all the lights went out in Srinagar. Suddenly, the city of Srinagar was plunged into darkness. The Maharaja, the British living in houseboats, and mainly the people of Srinagar, had no idea of what was happening. They didn’t think that it was a bad omen for the state and a harbinger of things to come. At the same time, hundreds of jackals, armed to the teeth are now nearing Baramulla, a border town in the valley. These jackals are nothing but wild natured Pathans originating from Peshawar. They are very optimistic about capturing the Kashmir valley and making it accede to Pakistan. This daring move from the Pathans was aided predominantly due to a political blunder made by the Maharaja of J&K, Hari Singh. During the accession of princely states with India and Pakistan, Lord Mountbatten urged him to make J&K accede to Pakistan, because of its predominant Muslim population and geographical proximity to Pakistan. He declined, as he was a Hindu. Mountbatten requested him to consider the option of merging with India at least. Again he declined, probably because the power and the charm associated with the throne intoxicated his mind. As a result, these marauders from the West began to invade J&K, spurred by vested interests in Pakistan. As these wild barbaric Pathans began closing in on the bustling town of Srinagar, they went on a killing and looting spree in the adjoining areas. The Maharaja was left with no option and blindly signed the accession treaty with India, without taking into account the will of his subjects. On October 27 1947, the Indian army entered the valley from the Jammu side and began to repel the marauding Pathans. This event marked the start of the first Kashmir war……


Troubled Region

After the first Kashmir war between India and Pakistan in 1947, the state was divided between the 2 nations. India took Jammu, Ladakh, and the Kashmir valley while Pakistan took the small strip of western Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan. According to the UN treaty, the state is disputed territory. Neither India nor Pakistan can claim the state. A plebiscite to decide whether the territory belongs to India or Pakistan has not been conducted for the past 61 years. Separatism and anti India feelings began to grow in the valley from 1947 onwards. The reason being its predominantly Muslim population and geographical proximity to Pakistan began to make the Kashmiri Muslims develop a soft corner and a sense of false brotherhood towards Pakistan. Since the early 1950’s, many people in the valley, especially Muslims, were made to believe that their land was being illegally occupied by India, thanks to the propaganda created by hardcore separatist leaders.

Till 1988, though this thought was ingrained in the hearts of many people, apart from a few, many didn’t express their outburst publicly. After the allegedly rigged elections in 1988, Kashmiri Muslims started to give vent to their anti India feelings publicly through violent protests. The agitation took an ugly turn when many of the youth started to take Kalashnikovs in their hands, and started waging Jihad (a holy war) against India. Consequently, militancy erupted and peaked in the early nineties. The Indian army controlled militancy during the mid and late 90’s.Miltancy started to decline after 2003 as a result of peace talks by the governments India and Pakistan and a bilateral ceasefire agreement followed. Militancy declined, but the alienation of Kashmiri Muslims from India’s mainstream was very pronounced and was at its zenith since the dawn of militancy. The Indian army already had a notorious name in dealing with counter insurgency. A standing example of this is when they were sent as peace keeping forces in Srilanka. There, they violated human rights in many Tamilian areas. They repeated the same blunder in Kashmir, thereby losing the faith and the trust of the people. Pro-Pakistani ISI elements in the valley used this opportunity to
further fuel the fire about separatist sentiments in the valley.

Present Turmoil

The state is well known for its religious harmony. Hindus and Muslims have lived in harmony for many years in the valley. During the partition of India, one part of the country, which didn’t bear the brunt of the Hindu-Muslim riots, was Kashmir valley. Even Mahatma Gandhi had a word of praise for the valley for maintaining its harmony and tolerance to other religions. But, at the onset of militancy, this house of harmony began to develop fissures. There were terrible and macabre attacks on Hindus (Kashmiri Pundits) by Islamic fundamentalists. This led to the ethnic cleansing of pundits from valley. Nearly five hundred thousand pundits abandoned the valley for fear of their lives (This divide became wider in the recent Amarnath land transfer controversy). Separatists began to control the functioning of the valley from this point onwards, firmly and fanatically.

When Hindu fundamentalists in Jammu began to enforce an economic blockade in the valley by stopping traffic on the NH-1A (Srinagar –Jammu highway which is the lifeline of the valley) a storm started brewing in Kashmir. Initially the situation could be compared to a Category 1 hurricane, when hundreds of people started to protest in the streets of every town of the valley. It became further elevated to a Category 3 hurricane like situation, when thousands of people tried to cross the LoC in trucks for doing trade as per the separatists call. The date was August 12, 2008, when 33 human lives were snuffed out, thanks to the stray bullets of the police and CRPF. A violent Category 5 hurricane like scenario started taking shape, threatening to raze to the ground everything that came in its midst. Just like a dam breached, the floodgates were thrown open and Millions of Kashmiri Muslims began to pour in from every nook and corner of the streets for each separatist’s protest call. Thousands and thousands of people defied the curfew, braving the bullets and the bitter cold. When Separatists chanted slogans like ‘Pampore Chalo’, ‘IdGah Chalo’, Lakhs and Lakhs of people attended the rally, chanting the same slogans along with their leaders in a state of frenzied stupor. It was just like a sea of people, with human waves as big as a tsunami. Separatists couldn’t believe that this much support could be garnered in such a short span of time. What militants, the ISI, and separatists failed to achieve in the valley since 1989, Hindu fanatics and a complacent Central Government have achieved for them. All this cauldron of frustration and pent-up emotions needed was a small spark of
hatred at the right time. And that was indeed present.

Wakeup India!!

What is Kashmir’s Destiny?

At present, we can think of two possible scenarios. As this chronic problem has not been amicably resolved for the past 6 decades, we have to completely rethink our policy towards Kashmir. For every kashmiri muslim, his/her blood flows with unique blood group namely F+, i.e. Freedom!! How long can we appease them with some CBM’s? CBM’s like constructing railways, srinagar-muzaffarabad trade, can make only temporary solution in their heart. Freedom is in their deep mind. So we can think rationally of giving self determination to the people.let them deceide their fate of 3 options,Independence,Pakistan,India. Kashmiri muslims at this stage will opt for independence as it is known by poll conducted by CNN-IBN 8 months ago. My mind says this solution as one option.. but thinking of this solution, as a Indian my heart breaks..


On the other hand, for a country to give an unstable and polarized territory autonomy is nothing short of hara-kiri for its national integrity and unity. Suppose the government fails to solve this issue amicably, at some point of time, Kashmir may get independence like Kosovo or may merge with Pakistan thanks to disgruntled and irate Kashmiris fighting for their cause. As an upshot, the adverse effects of this eventuality on India cannot even be imagined. Separatism may engulf many states of India like a raging forest fire. As of today, half a dozen states in the North eastern area are asking for freedom. The freedom of Kashmir may embolden them and they may pursue their cause further. After some years, India may have like situation of USSR splitting into pieces, Who knows, after some time even tamilnadu led by local Dravidian parties may ask freedom. Remember there was separatism in tamilnadu upto 1960.

So, this issue is very intricate and delicate, like a silk suit entangled in a thorny bush. It’s comparable to the unenviable situation of two airplanes standing on either sides of the same runway, wanting to take-off at the
same time. If both of them try to take-off at the same time, neither one will take-off. Similarly, the residents
of J&K need to unite, sit and talk together and iron out their differences to find an acceptable solution. So, a collective will is required from the people of Jammu, Kashmir and the rulers of the nation to achieve a common consensus, keeping in mind the nation’s best interests and developing a higher degree of tolerance towards the beliefs of other communities. One possible solution to current situation can be private investment and capital can enter the impoverished state. This will provide the youth of Kashmir with jobs in their hands instead of AK-47s and Kalashnikovs. Remember, economic salvation and the promise of a better future to Kashmir’s younger generation hold more water than idealistic (radical) principles. Of course, taking such a bold step requires a lion hearted administration, both at the centre and the state, educating the separatists and hard core leaders of the opportunities that lie before them if such a law is enacted and curbing the vested interests that may scuttle the implementation of such a law. This can also serve the purpose of integrating Muslims into the Indian mainstream, a cry long heard from many frustrated Muslims, Islamic clerics and politicians alike.

As this article is being drafted, another youth has perished on the already blood dyed streets of Srinagar. It makes one ask “Is blood cheaper than water in Kashmir”? Only the sands of time can reveal the answer.

http://www.risingkashmir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6811&Itemid=44

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Bhiwani to Beijing: Lessons from a journey

Bhiwani to Beijing: Lessons from a journey

  • Posted by Rajdeep Sardesi

Journalism has a nose for nostalgia : Twenty years ago ahead of the Seoul Olympics, I was sent as a cub reporter to track down the family of KD Jadhav, independent India's first Olympic medallist. The story of a wrestler in the small town of Karad in Maharashtra had a familiar ring to it: neglect, deprivation and a sense of anger at being forgotten in a cricket-crazy country. Ahead of the Beijing Olympics, the Jadhavs once again experienced their ritualistic date with fame. Perhaps, it's the last time we'll tell their tale. In the aftermath of Beijing, the country has found new Olympian families to showcase: next time, it will be the Bindras of Chandigarh and the Kumars of Bhiwani who will be celebrated. While India's first medallist died battling for his policeman's pension, the new generation heroes are already on the crorepati list.

Its taken fifty-six long and frustrating years for bronze to turn into gold for India's Olympic athletes.In the meantime, China, which won its first Olympic gold as late as 1984, has become the number one Olympic country, the US remains a powerhouse of talent, and even tiny Jamaica has established an enviable reputation.

If the Olympic medal tally was to rank countries in a ratio of population to medals won, we'd still probably be close to bottom, our sole satisfaction emerging from the fact that our eternal rivals, the Pakistanis, have drawn a blank.

Jadhav won his medal in the same year (1952) that India had its first general election. His win at the time should have heralded the arrival of a young nation on the world stage. Instead, it became a footnote in the history books. This was a time of the grand Nehruvian dream: of five year plans, scientific temper, non-alignment, big dams and heavy industries.In this vision of a new India, Olympic sports had little place. Hockey alone prospered because of the legacy that had been handed over by the colonialists: the clubs and army grounds remained the nurseries of the sport. The rest of Indian sport was literally consigned to endless debates about why we were an Olympic zero.

The Nehruvians saw sports as yet another large public sector undertaking, to be managed like a steel plant. The Soviet-style buildings that housed our sporting bodies typified a bureaucratic mindset: the malaise of sporting talent being controlled by mean-spirited officials never left us from the very beginning. Ironically, the Soviets (and now the Chinese) were highly successful in developing Olympic sport through a "controlled" system. The reason was simple: an autocratic model of managing sport can work in a totalitarian political system, not in a chaotic democracy like ours. The Chinese system can train six year old gymnasts to do sixty sit ups: in India, child rights activists would have filed a petition complaining of child abuse

And yet, maybe for the first time in six decades of independence, there may be a twist in the Indian Olympic tale and Beijing 2008 could mark a defining moment. For the first time there is a genuine belief that India's next Olympic gold wont take quite so long, and that by the year 2020, we might actually get enough medals for customs officials to take note. What has changed? On the surface, very little. Our officials still remain as lethargic and junket-obsessed as ever. We still hire sporting grounds for marriages. Our athletes still receive shamelessly meager daily allowances. And we still cant shake off the monopoly of cricket in our lives.

What we have shaken off though is the inferiority complex that was sustained by a litany of past failures. Its not just Abhinav Bindra's Mr Cool act that symbolizes a quiet confidence that was missing in previous Olympics. As a child of privilege, Bindra had the benefit of exceptional parental support from a very young age. In an expensive sport, his success was almost fashioned like a well-crafted business plan for which his family deserves enormous credit. But what is perhaps even more creditable is the remarkable performance of our boxers and wrestlers. Its not just the medals they've won, it's the journey they've undertaken to get there that suggests we have finally crossed a psychological barrier to actually compete at the highest level.

From Bhiwani to Beijing is an arduous road but one that the Kumars have shown the courage and passion to undertake. Mohammed Ali once famously said that to be a good boxer you needed strong fists, but an even stronger heart. To watch our boxers, win or lose, look at their opponents in the eye, must rank as one of the finer moments in Indian sport. Not to forget bronze medallist Sushil Kumar and tiny Saina Nehwal who showed enough talent in her first Olympic appearance to make us believe that she will win a medal in the future.

Undoubtedly, there are many more Sainas and Sushil Kumars waiting to be discovered. We are an aspirational society, one which is on the cusp of change. Sporting success is part of that process of change, of unleashing the dormant energies that were stifled by bureaucratic chains. We still don't have a sporting culture like the Americans or the Australians, but atleast we've moved beyond the Hindu rate of growth. As the economy expands, sports will be a natural beneficiary since it offers increasing opportunities for upward mobility, a chance to move overnight from a tinshed to a bungalow. Moreover, in the age of 24 hour news television, new role models are being constantly thrown up, with every medal won spurring a wave of nationalistic pride.

What is needed then is to sustain the Beijing momentum with a single-minded commitment to harness talent across the country, not just in the big cities. Cricket 'democratised' itself , which is why we have achieved so much success at the game. Now, other sports too need to be 'liberated' from the mai-baap culture of the Nehruvian era.

Here's a thought: why don't each of the IPL team owners adopt one sport and make it part of their business plan? Bhiwani could do with a world-class boxing gymnasium.

Posted by Rajdeep Sardesi

http://www.ibnlive.com/blogs/rajdeepsardesai/1/52610/bhiwani-to-beijing-lessons-from-a-journey.html

Monday, September 1, 2008

Ambivalent views over Gandhi killer

Ambivalent views over Gandhi killer
By Rajesh Joshi
BBC Hindi service


As India observes the 60th anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi's death, Hindu nationalist groups still grapple with the question whether to reject or appreciate his killer.

Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by a Hindu nationalist Nathuram Godse on 30 January, 1948 in Delhi's Birla House.

In the communally charged atmosphere during India's Partition in August 1947, Godse and his accomplices held Mahatma Gandhi responsible for the miseries of the Hindus and accused him of appeasing Muslims.

Right-wing Hindu nationalist organisations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, (Nationalist Volunteers' Organisation) were banned and many of its leaders were sent to jail following the assassination of Gandhi.

The RSS is the ideological fountainhead of India's main opposition party BJP.

'Selfless act'

Nathuram Godse was later tried and hanged but the RSS was exonerated and the government decided to lift the ban on its activities.

Even though the RSS publicly rejects Nathuram Godse, its leaders don't hide their appreciation for what they call his "selfless act".

"We will have to accept that Nathuram Godse acted with selfless spirit; he did not have any self-interest in it. He must also have been aware that he would be hanged for what he was going to do. This spirit cannot be denied," RSS ideologue Devendra Swaroop told the BBC.

"But he was wrong if he thought that Gandhiji was taking history in a wrong direction and by killing him he could correct the course of history," adds Mr Swaroop.

"RSS firmly believes that Godse acted at the spur of the moment and it was quite detrimental for the Hindu society. Gandhi dead proved to be stronger than Gandhi alive."


Leaders of the Bajrang Dal, another affiliate of the RSS, believe that Godse's role in history needs to be reassessed.

"People may object to his method but I don't believe that he committed such an act (of killing Gandhi) with some personal animosity," says Prakash Sharma, head of the Bajrang Dal.

"He was concerned for the country and at that time he did what he thought was right."

Gandhi and his thoughts have more than once posed a challenge to the ideology of Hindu nationalists.

Some Hindu leaders openly condemned Gandhi's policy of non-violence and friendship between Hindus and Muslims during the anti-Muslim riots that broke out in India's western state Gujarat in February 2002.

'Abandon Gandhi'

Pravin Togadia of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council) said in a public gathering: "Until the day we give up Gandhi's ideology of non violence and the ideology of surrendering before the Muslims, terrorism cannot be defeated."

"My brothers, we will have to abandon Gandhi."

However, RSS spokesman Ram Madhav denies that his organisation faces a dilemma about Godse.

"This issue had been resolved decades ago that he (Godse) had nothing to do with RSS and Gandhiji's assassination had nothing to do with RSS," he said.

But Mahatma Gandhi's great grandson Tushar Gandhi is not impressed - he accuses the RSS of doublespeak.

"Whenever an organisation uses a weapon to achieve its agenda, it abandons the weapon after using it. They use and throw it like a condom," he said.

"I have seen a deep feeling of devotion in the Sangh Parivar (or the RSS family) for Nathuram Godse and I know how they cherish him. But they do it secretly because they lack the courage."

Courtesy: BBC News

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7217146.stm

Impressions from Kashmir war zone

Impressions from Kashmir war zone

Indian troops have been fighting an insurgency by Islamic militants in Indian-administered Kashmir since 1989. Here, a young Indian soldier who has just been stationed there reflects on the sadness of war.

First impressions - I land at Srinagar after waiting for six hours for the flight to take off.

Indian troops in Srinagar
Indian troops are highly visible on the streets of Srinagar

It's winter here, that's why the delay, but still I'm excited. Almost think of it as my destiny.

I don't believe in destiny, that's why almost. The air is cold. Bites me.

It's fresh, exhilarating. It's different. But I feel unusually happy. Wonder why?

There are vehicles here to receive us at the airport, and we drive back to our location.

Distrust

I drive through the city and I see people who wear clothes differently.

The women are beautiful. Not like the good-looking women down in Delhi, but really beautiful.

And it takes a decent amount of effort not to stare. But I manage.

The shadow of the gun looms large and suddenly I feel very suffocated


I am so enthralled by the trees, the streams, the hills in the far distance, the cold air, the snow, everything. But there is something else.

Every 50 metres there's this man standing with a weapon. In uniform. A soldier.

Every five minutes there is a convoy of army vehicles passing by with weapon-bearing, menacing-looking men, standing on top, looking down.

Eyes furtively searching for something. Anything.

The air is heavy and not free. The shadow of the gun looms large and suddenly I feel very suffocated.

The army is omnipresent. It's like darkness filling up a vacuum.

I don't think these people think of me as their own, the local public that is.

But since they have no choice they accept me (they have no choice). And I think, why is it this way?

Why is it that the place I think of as my own country, people that I think of as my own people do not really want me here?

Their eyes look at me with distrust, and resignation. And I want to get out and tell them that I'm alright.

'Another soldier in uniform'

Then I look at myself, and see myself in uniform and I see what they see.

soldier in argument
A Kashmiri woman argues with a soldier during a search operation

"Another soldier in uniform."

And I guess they are not wrong in feeling what they feel. And I feel very sad at the state of affairs.

I want to tell them that I am about as good or as bad as any of them, and I am not here to harm them.

Beneath the uniform I am just a young man in his twenties trying to find answers in life.

I also love the smell of freshly fallen rain on the earth, laugh with my friends, smile when a baby smiles, love a beautiful woman, enjoy movies and music and do all the normal things that anyone does.

I am not responsible for the state of affairs.

Then the question pops in my mind, who is?

There come a multitude of answers: the Indian government, the Pakistani state, poor leadership, mismanagement of affairs, rigged elections and many more.

Just history?

But all this is just history and we cannot do anything about it. The real reason for the state of affairs is us - you and I.

We are responsible for how things are and we alone can put them right.

There are discussions and more discussions on the solutions to the problem and I really do not want to get into any of that.

kashmiri children
Kashmiri children playing near the Line of Control
All I am saying is that it is sad that small children are not amazed any more when they see a weapon-carrying man around them - a militant or a soldier.

That if one is not home at night, the fear of never seeing them again sets in, that young teenagers grow up in an atmosphere of terror, never realising what it means to be free.

What I am saying is that I may be a soldier, but I am definitely not the enemy.

In the end, there is still hope. As we turn round the corner, we slow down. There are small children playing.

One of them, a small boy of five or six, looks up and waves at me. And he smiles. A genuine smile that only children have.

I wave back. He has not learnt yet that here you do not wave and smile at army men. There is still hope.

The soldier wished to remain anonymous. His account first appeared on the BBC Urdu service website.

Courtesy: BBC news

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6262743.stm

How the PS3 led Blu-ray's triumph

How the PS3 led Blu-ray's triumph
By Will Smale
Business reporter, BBC News

Blu-ray disc and player
Blu-ray looks to have won the high definition DVD battle

The next-generation DVD format war is over, and the future is Blu-ray.

Ever since the two rival high definition DVD systems were launched in 2006 - Sony's Blu-ray and Toshiba's HD DVD - there could only be one winner.

In a re-run of the VHS and Betamax video cassette battle of the early 1980s, each raced to win over both the home consumer and the big Hollywood film studios.

Toshiba's announcement that it is to stop production of HD DVD players leaves the way clear for Blu-ray to become the industry standard.

Yet how did Toshiba fail while Sony succeeded?

It is a story of computer game consoles, marketing savvy and schmoozing in Los Angeles, as well as Sony's determination not to let history repeat itself.

Which, at the end of the day, all boils down to much higher sales figures for Sony.

Playstation advantage

The first factor that needs to be put completely to one side is picture quality. Unless you are a technology geek with a television the size of a multiplex cinema screen, there is no difference between the output of HD DVD and Blu-ray machines.

Sony Playstation 3
Sony's Playstation 3 gave Blu-ray a key advantage

Both offer high definition DVD playback superior to standard DVD players.

Where Sony had the killer edge is that its Playstation 3 (PS3) computer games console comes pre-fitted with a Blu-ray player.

So as Sony has sold 10.5 million PS3 consoles since it was launched in late 2006, that is 10.5 million Blu-ray machines already in homes around the world, before you add sales of stand-alone Blu-ray players.

By contrast, Toshiba has sold only one million HD DVD machines.

Toshiba does have a tie-up with Microsoft's Xbox 360 games console, but Xbox users are required to buy an external HD DVD drive.

And as Toshiba's one million sales figure for HD DVD machines also includes shipments of these drives, it appears that not many Xbox owners have been bothered to go to the additional expense.

Hollywood moves

Sony also had a head start over Toshiba in persuading the big US film studios to back Blu-ray - its own Sony Pictures is one of the main players in Hollywood.

It's good for consumers, some of whom must have been resisting buying next-generation DVD recorders because of the two incompatible formats
Gartner analyst Hiroyuki Shimizu

Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox joined Sony Pictures in supporting Blu-ray.

And although Paramount Pictures, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros initially decided to back HD DVD, Warner Bros switched sides last month.

For many analysts, this was the final nail in the coffin for HD DVD.

"When Warner made its decision, it was basically over," says Kazuharu Miura, an analyst at Daiwa Institute of Research in Tokyo.

Key US DVD retailers Target and Blockbuster have also decided to go with Blu-ray.

Betamax lessons

Other analysts also point to Sony's better marketing campaign for Blu-ray, fuelled by its determination not to lose a format war that brought back painful memories of the defeat of its Betamax video format by the JVC-developed VHS.

HD DVD sign
Is HD DVD going to go the same way as Betamax?

Although Betamax offered better picture quality, VHS machines were cheaper and quickly gained the majority of market share, eventually killing off Betamax.

It appears that Sony spent many years analysing that defeat and this time around, it was much better prepared.

Putting a Blu-ray player in each PS3 was the secret weapon to ensure the format's presence in customers' front rooms around the world, effectively making their choice of high definition DVD player for them.

Toshiba's gain

While Toshiba's decision to end the production of HD DVD players is undoubtedly a humiliation for the company, analysts say it will be good for the firm's profits.

Goldman Sachs estimates that the move will boost Toshiba's profitability by up to 40bn yen ($370m; £190m) a year.

"The potential losses are small compared to the savings," says Goldman Sachs analyst Ikuo Matsuhashi.

Commentators also point to the fact that as consumer electronics is such a small part of Toshiba's business, it could afford to lose the format battle.

For while finished electrical goods such as laptops, DVD players and televisions make up just 6% of Toshiba's profits, it makes 40% of them from the sale of computer chips and a similar proportion from its nuclear power operations.

By contrast, consumer electrical goods have always been core to Sony's profits.

Uninterested consumers?

But what does it all mean for consumers?

"It's good for consumers, some of whom must have been resisting buying next-generation DVD recorders because of the two incompatible formats," says Hiroyuki Shimizu, an analyst at IT research company Gartner.

"If there's only one format, consumers don't have to worry about incompatibility."

Yet while Mr Shimizu predicts sales of Blu-ray players and discs will now take off, other analysts say the format battle is meaningless.

They say this is because a growing number of consumers are already turning their backs on DVD players to download their movies via the internet instead, or from their satellite or cable television provider.

Adding that electronics companies are wrong to assume that viewers want ever better picture quality, they point to the failure of high fidelity music formats Super Audio CD and DVD-Audio in the face of the explosion in the popularity of music downloads.

While typical digital music formats such as MP3 have reduced sound quality compared with even standard CDs, their convenience has more than won over consumers.

The future of high definition DVD players may very well be Blu-ray, but whether they can make a dent in the face of the growing march of computer downloads is quite another story.